A leading U.S. bank had over 200 diverse models across product categories that had to be assessed periodically in adherence to the Dodd-Frank Act
The bank partnered with WNS to leverage analytics and industry best practices for its model risk management function
The partnership enabled the bank to improve its model validation standards and comply with the Dodd-Frank Act and Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review submissions with ease
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires the U.S. Federal Reserve (FED) to conduct annual stress tests of large banks. Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST) are outcomes of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Failure on the part of banks to comply with CCAR and DFAST leads to heavy fines. It also has an adverse impact on the brand image.
The FED established the model validation council in 2012. The council is tasked with the role of rigorously assessing the models used in stress tests by banks. These stringent norms and timelines put pressure on banks and their model risk management function.
It had over 200 diverse models spread across varied product categories. To comply with CCAR and DFAST requirements, the bank had to conduct stress tests leveraging its existing model validation framework and subject all its models to periodic reviews and validation.
Faced with a shortage of talent, assessing and validating the accuracy of existing models at regular intervals was a daunting task. The bank partnered with WNS to augment its model risk management function by leveraging a team of statistical experts and industry best practices.
WNS leveraged its analytics expertise to build a sophisticated framework to validate the accuracy of models that were similar to the client’s existing models. The framework entailed:
Single and multi-step back testing
Sensitivity and scenario analysis
Multiple validation and scoring methods were deployed to improve the bank’s modeling standards. Detailed validation reports were prepared for each model to highlight the shortcomings.
WNS performed stress testing on the models using macroeconomic variables and assessed the impact of stress scenarios on the bank’s capital and profitability. The stress scenarios were in accordance with CCAR and DFAST norms, and the client’s risk management policies.
In collaboration with the bank, WNS also built models for Loss Given Default (LGD) and these were used as references for the client’s existing LGD model.
That the models helped improve decision-making and risk management. The bank was able to discard and replace models that were not performing well. The WNS validation reports enabled the bank to recalibrate its statistical approaches and enhance the model validation standards.
The enhanced standards have enabled the bank to comply with CCAR and DFAST submissions since 2015 with ease. WNS has also been working extensively to improve the bank’s model governance through bespoke projects including:
Grading the models based on various micro and macroeconomic conditions
Checking the relevance of the variables used in the models
Overall model inventory management
Join the conversation
Banking and Financial Services
14 September 2021
14 June 2021
26 November 2020